Hi Jason, *, On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Jason Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Jason Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I know this is not an official QA response, >> >> But I was looking for a QA-Rep, not only for comments. >> Why do you think it is not an official "QA response"/what is missing >> in your opinion? > > Well, I see how to add myself as a QA-Rep in EIS, but I don't see my ID on > the list, so I hesitate to just type myself in.
Well - if you tell me your OOo-login/address I can type you in. Don't hesitate to add yourself (although I don't know whether it is possible to set oneself as QA of a cws one doesn't own - just try and we'll see) > It does look good to me, and if you need someone to sign off on it, and if I > am considered qualified, then I'll gladly put my name in as QA-Rep. Thing > is, I only built it on Leopard Intel, so I can't say if there would be > problems on another arch. Well - I did announce the cws here, mentioned it on the IRC channel a few times, people had a chance to have a look :-) And as the cws is not critical in any way (I mean it only removes per-facto dead code: It is Mac OSX only and nobody uses Mac OSX 10.2 to build anymore, the aqua version requires 10.4 as baseline anyway) so there shouldn't be any effects on other operating systems - and I have the PPC tinderbox here that doesn't have any problems with it either.. ciao Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
