On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Amit Singh wrote:
> They do use MacFUSE. They don't use ntfs-3g.
The MacFUSE part was obvious, the less so one is how they access NTFS
read/write without virtualization? If they indeed do, as I was told,
perhaps incorrectly.
Szaka
> On Nov 9, 7:30 am, Szabolcs Szakacsits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Amit Singh wrote:
> > > Parallels doesn't use ntfs-3g.
> >
> > Do you mean not anymore or they never used it?
> >
> > Many user problems were reported due to MacFUSE version conflict with
> > Parallel in the Summer but indeed not anymore. They explained in the
> > knowledgebase and support forums that Parallels Desktop use MacFUSE to
> > mount Windows drives to the Mac Desktop. I don't know what exactly this
> > means but some users say that Parallels Explorer is actually an interface
> > for MacFUSE and NTFS-3G, so one can access NTFS without going through
> > virtualization.
> >
> > What I certainly know is that VMware uses it.
> >
> > Szaka
> >
> > --
> > NTFS-3G Lead Developer: http://ntfs-3g.org
>
>
> >
>
--
NTFS-3G Lead Developer: http://ntfs-3g.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"macfuse-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
