hmm, maybe not necessarily true? jed wrote: > Yeah suspected that much... > So it's prolly not a good idea to be using to the macfuse beta update > channel if the stuff running on top (ntf-3g) is always going to be > stable releases... > Don't you reckon? > > Erik Larsson wrote: > >>> Hmm, I'll stick with 2.14beta and see if there is also a way to get beta >>> (not alpha) builds of ntfs-3g "automatically" >>> >>> >>> >> There isn't. >> You can compile release candidates from source, but that's your only >> option if you're addicted to prerelease software. :) >> >> - Erik
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
