Amit writes MacFUSE in his spare time and from what I gather, he's rather busy at Google.
The entire Mac community benefits having him lead this project; there are extremely few people who can produce kernel code of such complexity and quality. While I understand your desire to have MacFUSE working in 64-bit mode - try to avoid suggesting that Amit *owes* you updates and notes regarding this project he gracefully pours his spare time into without direct compensation or incentive. -Jeff On Sep 9, 5:52 pm, exs <[email protected]> wrote: > I applied the patches that Tomas posted > at:http://github.com/wereHamster/macfuse/commit/37e56cf70e48eba5802dc09e... > > I was able to re-compile MacFUSE and get it to load in a 10.0.0 64-bit > kernel. > > Although this may be a simple fix that is all that we need to get it > working, and be stable, there is NO confirmation from Amit. As far as > I can tell, this is the only patch made public for MacFuse to work the > latest 64-bit Snow Leopard kernel. With so many people depending upon > MacFUSE to support their projects, you think there would be more > community involvement, or discussion. > > I was so excited to see a post from Amit on his blog, after 5.5 months > of no activity. I thought for sure a patch to MacFUSE would be out > shortly. Nothing. The only thing is Amit commenting on how to get the > 64bit kernel working on machines that normally won't enable it: > http://www.osxbook.com/blog/2009/08/31/is-your-machine-good-enough-fo... > > Thats it? > > *silence* --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
