This is one case in which I'm HAPPY to be wrong ;) Thanks for the quick response. I imagine I'm probably not the only one who was confused about this. The last I heard a couple weeks ago, I thought the NTFS/NTFS-3G dependencies were buggy/un-stable in Snow Leopard. I understand that it doesn't work in the 64-bit kernel --- who's using that right now anyway?
I just read the thread, and understand the difference between MacFuse, NTFS/NTFS-3G. Are you saying that the NTFS-3G is stable and/or working well right now in Leopard? (In your experience... I'm not asking you to support or speak for other people's software). Off-topic, but somewhat related: The last I tried, I wasn't able to duplicate my SSHFS success on my Snow Leopard machine (that I was previously using on my Leopard / PPC box). I guess I should RTFM and "try, try again"?? Thanks again! On Jan 14, 10:22 am, Taylor Heffernan <[email protected]> wrote: > It works just fine in Snow Leopard - just not in the 64-bit kernel, > which there is no reason to use anyway at this point. > > All of your NTFS answers are > herehttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/browse_thread/thread/19d31ac8f...
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
