On 7/21/10 11:28 AM, Misch Masch wrote: > Dear Mr. Amit Singh, > > I sincerely appreciate all the work you've put into MacFuse. Tomas > Carnecky made that Snow Leopard 64-bit port which is crutial for some > task (e.g. running TrueCrypt on 64-bit systems). It seems that his > version is doing fine. His announcement has been here for almost 2 > months. Could you explain your stance on this? > > Why can't this be officially released, since it seems to fix all > issues with 64-bit systems. > > I'm not a developer myself so please bare with me if I mistook any > technical details. > > But wouldn't it be possible to have more than one developer on this? > > Why not make the GitHub repo the official home? > > Also in your post from 30 Sep. 2009 03:51 you refere to a version > which can't be found in the place you posted a link to. See how you use the words 'it seems to' a lot. My version indeed 'seems to' fix the problems, but it actually does not. The problem was described in one of the threads: the way I fixed macfuse can cause problems, from filesystem corruption to a kernel panic. So it's definitely not ready to be released as an official version. The real fix is quite complex and requires intimate knowledge of the xnu kernel and filesystems. And nobody seems to have the time to learn all these things about macosx.
tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
