On 17 Oct 2010, at 05:47, Benjamin wrote: > Thank-worthy is the fact that Tuxera releases the source code of "tufs". > > It took me some time but I "back-ported" the changes the guys at Tuxera made > (aka tufs 201010.07) to the trunk version of MacFUSE. Applying the changes to > the fusefs.fs component was fairly easy since all the hard work had been done > by Tuxera.
> I did some testing and never got a kernel panic or data corruption. > Despite the fact that my tests went well I consider my modifications to > MacFUSE beta. Thanks to Tuxera and Benjamin! The build of 2.1.7 from MacFUSE 2.1.7 (10.6 i386, x86_64).dmg at <http://www.mediafire.com/?qpt4bdp0yqak7x4> seems to resolve <http://bugs.wuala.com/view.php?id=2522>. > testing was done by repeatedly copying 100 random data files of different > file sizes simultaneously to a NTFS formatted volume and comparing the copies > to the original files afterwards. The files were an exact match every time. > As far as I understand Amit's comments in the past Does anyone have a URL for those comments? (Google Groups search is close to useless.) > this test should have triggered a kernel panic in the unofficial MacFUSE > build released by someone else some month ago, URL, anyone? > where just two safeguards had been commented but no locking mechanisms were > applied. Would there be value in me performing a similar file copy test to a volume mounted by Wuala? Thanks, Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
