On Mar 4, 2:13 am, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:

> relatively-stable

Do we know of any way in which Tuxera's
macfuse-core-10.5-2.1.9.dmg is *not* stable?

The topic for feedback on that build
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/browse_thread/thread/e118593dcf5f8caf
is locked by Google (does anyone have an axe?)
and the issues mentioned in that topic were not confidently related to
that build.

Discussion of Tuxera's macfuse-rebel-2.1.9-src.tar.bz2
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/msg/743cc39ff2f0b984 stated
that there were

>> no serious issues (hangs, crashes, ...)
>> with 64-bit support at this time

Also in that post:

>> it would be nice to improve locking so that more
>> code can run concurrently

-- but I treat that as a performance issue, not instability.

Earlier, at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/msg/08b51b5bb0744358

>>> Release b) … a bit error-prone

But I don't know whether those errors cause instability.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacFUSE" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.

Reply via email to