At this point KFS is too new to have something like SSHFS running on it. It's also not a drop in replacement for tools built on FUSE. It's a library that allows developers to create new types of filesystems (that works a little more seamlessly with what's shipped with OS X by default).
For SSHFS, you'll want to use MacFUSE. Whitney Young FadingRed [email protected] www.fadingred.com On Apr 18, 2011, at 3:35 PM, besson3c wrote: > Is there any documentation on what KFS will do, how to get it going, > etc.? I'm looking for a stable SSHfs implementation... > > On Apr 13, 10:24 am, [email protected] wrote: >> There's another new project that's similar over >> here:https://bitbucket.org/fadingred/kfshttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kfs-dev >> >> I posted on here about it once before, but since Taylor said he hadn't heard >> of any similar projects, I figured I'd plug it again. If you would like more >> info or have questions, feel free to email the KFS list. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Whitney Young >> FadingRed >> [email protected] >> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 2:02 AM, Taylor Heffernan wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> The group has job postings because there has always been a spam problem in >>> google groups. The project is slow moving because the primary contributers >>> to the code don't have time to work on it anymore, and the working build is >>> an "unofficial" build. I hear that Expandrive doesn't use the macfuse >>> framework anymore, so either they rolled their own fuse system or they >>> found another project. I haven't heard of any other projects like macfuse >>> so I assume it's the former. >> >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:21 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello, >> >>> I'm wondering what the status of this project is? I'm a little confused why >>> the only build that works is not available through the main MacFUSE site, >>> why the discussion forums have job postings, etc. >> >>> Has interest diminished? Is there some major technological hurdle with the >>> 64 bit kernel? Is there a competing project that works better? >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacFUSE" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacFUSE" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacFUSE" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
