I agree that this "official" repository is an absolutely terrible idea and a huge step backwards in the source. If you want to have 10.6 support please please fork from
https://github.com/tuxera/macfuse Not Anatol's patch, which is NOT suitable to go out in production. Also - ExpanDrive has been holding onto the Github account for "macfuse" which these guys have usurped. We will be asking for it back from github. This kind of mess is a big problem and what we'd all like to avoid. -Jeff On May 5, 8:16 am, Peter Stegemann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 May, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > >> This one seems to work quite well on 10.6.7 + 64bit-Kernel and it's pretty > >> close on working on Lion. > > As Tomas said there are several implementations of macfuse 10.6 support. > > One of them is macports patches. > > Hm, I haven't been talking about support for 10.6, but about 64bit-Kernel > and Lion... I fear this is a huge step backwards in the source, while more > and more users are using the inofficial 2.1.9 - that is quite often > recommended here. Having an official 2.1.9 (or maybe better 2.1.10) would IMO > be a good step to reduce the chaos out there. > > Regards, > Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
