On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 10:53 PM, Marta Edie wrote:

> Thanks so very much Lee." Hut ab"  to all that knowledge.. So I was on 
>  the
> right track, I looked at my preferences again and for the import it 
> says it
> is a MATSHITA CD-RW CW-8121, it is burning at maximum speed. For the 
> import
> it says Better quality 160 kbps, It also has a best quality of 192 . 
> Should
> I set it on this quality?  I learned from your explanation  192  is 
> better .
> but Is there a drawback  somewhere else in setting it that high , and 
> once
> set at 192, can I keep it there indefinitely?

The tradeoffs are between sound quality and file size. More kilobits 
per second gives you better sound quality, but the file sizes are 
bigger. I can't tell the difference between a CD and an MP3 when the 
rate is 192 kb/s, and rarely ever hear a difference at 160 kb/s. I can 
hear the difference at 128 kb/s on good playback equipment.

My daughter, who knows a lot more about music than I do and has younger 
ears, claims she can tell the difference at 160 kb/s.

Most of the time I listen to MP3s when I'm driving. (I have an in-dash 
MP3-CD player.) With all that background noise, there's no difference 
between 128 and an audio CD to my ears.



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be March 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.


Reply via email to