I agree completely with the notion that the G5 is worth the extra bucks. I have used Dual Processor G4s (1.25/1.42) for Photoshop/Flash/Final Cut, you name it and my G5 (with Panther) was much much faster on renders, filter, and overall system performance. The main reason for this difference is that while the G5 is a 64-bit processor, underneath the hood there are much more important differences, in how the processor handles individual commands and in what quantities things are processed making things run a lot smoother on the surface.
I have also used those dual Zeon things everyone in the PC world talks about and as far as Photoshop is concerned, unless you like a PC enough to wait on it go with the mac. It is comparable to the DP G4s but you have to have that thing completely maxed out to equal a DP 1.8 G5 and until Intel comes out with something better they are just not the same as the DP 2.0 Ghz. As well the G5 handles multiple applications with much better ease then the G4 even with Classic apps (Yes, Classic runs on the G5, no sweat). Price is always an issue but if the money is there for the G5 I believe she will be much happier and better off on the long run with that machine over the G4. Mike Garton On May 3, 2004, at 2:57 PM, Jerry Yeager wrote: > The G4 will work, but it is well well worth the extra money to get the > G5 (the time saved = $$$ alone will cause it to pay for itself > quickly.) I do a whole lot of digital photography and digital video > work and the G5 speed gains over the G4 are extremely nice. > > But use the DP G5. (Remember a small 6 MB RAW file will turn into a 32 > MB TIFF or PSD file (adding layers to these makes the file size go up > as well!), so she needs some horsepower to do the processing on those > files in reasonable amounts of time. If she is dealing with the 14 MB > Kodak or Canon RAW files, these get expand to a way larger TIFF or PSD > file and if she is using MF (22MB RAW file size) or LF (Huge file > size) equipment with digital backs, well, lets say it behooves her to > not skimp on the processing power. (It takes the very high end PCs to > come sort of close to the DP G5). I recommend a DP G5 with at least 2 > GB of memory (actually as much as she can put in there). Since she is > not moving legacy OS-9 apps over to the Mac platform, there should not > be major problems with the transition. Also the 23 inch HD Cinema > Display is a very good choice for a monitor. > > As far as your other question (your own new system), it should work > for the most part. A 1.42 GHz DP desktop will blow a 1.33 GHz laptop > out of the water, but the laptop can go places the desktop cannot (or > should not). > > > Jerry > > > On May 03, 2004, at 8:07 AM, David M wrote: > >> HI, >> I've been a lurker for a couple of years and this is >> my first post. I've used macs since the mac plus days >> but the highest OS I've used is 9.1, I currently have >> a StarMax 5000 (clone of mac 4400) with G3 card >> 300mhz. >> >> My sister, a PC user, is a budding professional >> photographer who is starting a move into digital >> photography. She wants to buy a mac and told me she is >> thinking about a G4. >> I started researching and found that Apple is shipping >> a G4 1.25 and 1.25 DP with combo drives and prices are >> $1299 and $1599. super drives are $200 more. These >> also will boot up in OS 9 and OS X. >> >> My question is How do you think a 1.25 DP would >> compare to a G5 performance wise. Keep in mind that my >> sister would be dealing with raw photo files. Also >> check out this article that indicates the 1.25 DP is a >> better deal than the G5 1.6 and 1.8 single processor >> macs. They say the G5 2.0 DP would blow a G4 away but >> we are talking about a price of $2999. >> http://www.lowendmac.com/musings/03/0625.html >> >> I'd like to hear from people who have had experience >> manipulating photos on these systems. >> >> Also, this is a question for myself, since I'd like to >> get a new system, How valuable do you view a current >> G4 that is OS 9 bootable? Since all my software is >> written for OS 9 and before, should this be a major >> consideration or is the classic mode of OS X >> sufficient? ( I don't currently use professional audio >> apps) >> >> One last question, How do you think a powerbook >> 1.33ghz would compare in performance to a desktop 1.25 >> Dp or a 1.42 DP? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> David >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________ >> Do you Yahoo!? >> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs >> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover >> >> >> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will >> | be May 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. >> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> >> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> >> > > > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > | be May 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> > | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be May 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
