I'm with Harry, I'm stuck at work with using the full version of Outlook for my email through our exchange box and it does not support html email on the Mac. If I want to look at an html message I have to go through hoops to do it and it is too time consuming. Why Microsoft can't make the full version do something that Express handles so well I'll never figure out. I lost a lot of neat feature when I moved to Exchange.
Beth > ---------- > From: Harry Jacobson-Beyer > Reply To: macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:06 PM > To: macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu > Subject: Re: MacGroup: Keychain password > > I HATE html email. It takes forever to open, and the longer the email message > the longer it takes to open. I especially detest html spam email. > > So all you potential emailers out there, please don't send me html email. > > TYVM. > > Harry > > on 09/17/2002 1:36 PM, Tony LaFemina at remacs at optonline.net wrote: > > > > Lee Larson wrote: > > > On Monday, September 16, 2002, at 11:44 AM, Nelson Helm wrote: > > > > The weekly digests I get are filled with repeats, (each e-mail > containing it's predecessors) and html code, which together makes them almost > incomprehensible. > > > > I think daily digests are more in order. The html code is the fault of > people who use html mail when they shouldn't. (I never use styled mail when I > don't know for sure that the receiver can handle it. Plain text is > appropriate 99% of the time.) > --- > Lee Larson, Mathematics Department, University of Louisville > Phone: 502.852.6826 FAX: 502.852.7132 > > > > Your reaction to this HTML thing in e-mail sounds synonymous with the movie > Pleasantville, which is currently being shown on cable. I personally think it > should be left up to the sender of the e-mail on how they want to format it. > Both Netscape and Outlook Express are free downloads and recognize both plain > text and HTML. If anyone has a mail program that can't read HTML, then let > them download one of these if they want. > > I remember a while back when frames were first introduced to the internet. I > would go to some address and a page would open, declaring that if my browser > couldn't handle frames, I couldn't visit their web site. I thought that was > odd. I was under the impression that the whole idea of putting up a web site > was to get as many people to visit and see what was there. Anyway, my > reaction was "I didn't want to see your stupid web site anyway!" and went on > my way. (That's one reason why I still use simple HTML code for my web site). > I was working with frames in ClarisWorks v2 long before it was introduced to > the internet, but these people made it sound like it was a revolutionary new > concept in desktop computing. > > If you're referring to those e-mails that show all the HTML coding, and you > have to read between the lines to decipher it, I think that's because the > people that sent those e-mails didn't know what they were doing. A good rule > to follow is, if you're experimenting with e-mail, send it to yourself first. > > > > > Harry, > > > Harry Jacobson-Beyer > Surveyor of the Passing Scene! > > http://bellsouthpwp.net/h/a/harryjb/ > What a strange, long, trip it is! > > remember: it's not how fast you climb the hill that matters, it's how fast > you go coming down! > > The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be September 24 For more information, see <http://www.aye.net/~lcs>. A calendar of activities is at <http://www.calsnet.net/macusers>.
