I have upgraded to NeoOffice 2, beta 3 build. It is still slow, but  
it's performance is a good 1/3 faster.

ctw

On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Jonathan Fletcher wrote:

> 'Cause it's Java, and Apple's Java is not the speediest  
> implementation around.
>
> j.
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Lee Larson <llarson at louisville.edu>  
> wrote:
>
>> I've been using one of these for over a year now. Check out NeoOffice
>> [1], they just came out with a major upgrade to the latest code base
>> for OpenOffice and it's free. It works pretty well, although it takes
>> a long time to start up for some reason.
>
> --
> Jonathan Fletcher
> jfletch at newmediaconstco.com
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be September 26 at Pitt Academy, 6010 Preston Highway.
> | The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be September 26 at Pitt Academy, 6010 Preston Highway.
| The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>

Reply via email to