True about adobe. However their applications wouldnt benefit from checking for the latest copy for has an application update built in so you should already know if you are running the latest build.
In the Windows world I would never consider doing an upgrade from the previous OS. However when I upgraded from panther I was very surpised how easy it was and how well it worked. So I'm still on the fence but I have a spare 500g I was using for time machine when beta testing. I think I will delete it repartion it into two volumes. The first volume for a drive clone so I can boot back up in tiger to make sure I have a backup plan. The 2nd volume can then be used for my fresh install of leopards time machine. The whole 500g will be backups. It will just hold both methods of incremental and full clone on the two different volumes. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Jerry Freeman <x12 at insightbb.com> wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Stuart Urbahns wrote: > > <snip> > >> due to the developers having plenty of time to get ready for leopard. > > final build has been seeded only within the last 30 days?not much > time to verify and/or recode a robust application. adobe noted last > week that it's applications have yet to be verified against final > build. > > having the luxury of multiple available disks, i plan a clean install > of leopard as a separate boot disk, then clean install my > applications and devices one at a time as they are verified. > > i'm particularly interested in the nuances of time machine on > external disk, as i plan to move to a macbook pro after macworld. > best...jf > _______________________________________________ > The next Louisville Computer Society meeting will > be October 23 at MacAuthority, 128 Breckinridge Lane. > Posting address: MacGroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu > Information: http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup >
