On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 4:20:41 PM UTC+10, Schooner wrote: > > On 12/05/2017 02:11, Hedge Hog wrote: > > > > > Can you elaborate on the status of MT in terms of replacing NML? > > Also what the intent/scope of MT is in terms of replacing NML? > > > Perhaps it is time for you to elaborate upon who you are,
Not really. Pseudonymous and anonymous publishing has a long and distinguished history. Perhaps I missed it in the projects C4 document at [1]. If so could you point out what in the C4 you believe makes your condition/demand reasonable. > what your > agenda / intentions are and why you keep asking all these questions? > > Before I use it on anything that can set my house on fire, or send shrapnel around the neighborhood.... I'd like to understand MK and MT and one way to do that is to (try to) contribute to MT. Per the projects C4 Goals at [1] I think my agenda/intentions are in line with the following: "To reduce the internal complexity of project repositories, thus making it easier for Contributors to participate and reducing the scope for error" "To allow the project to develop faster and more accurately, by increasing the diversity of the decision making process;" "To support the natural life cycle of project versions from experimental through to stable, by allowing safe experimentation, rapid failure, and isolation of stable code" > Are you intending contributing something, if so what? I have posted a PoC here: https://gist.github.com/hedgehog/de4b423f31451035514362a4a2e0f7c6 This might become just another one of the ways to generate a FSM and interact with it or MK might take the approach of providing one canonical implementation of FSM's or it might have several, or it might encourage each to implement their own. A PR to machinekoder here: https://github.com/machinekoder/machinekit-docs/pull/4 And some other thoughts on the MT messaging requirements and implementation choices that are a WIP. I haven't pushed these yet because they are a bit raw and I feel like I'm finding my feet still - no need me unnecessarily looking stupid if I can avoid it by just waiting, and pushing something that is more fully formed ;) Appreciate your thoughts/opinions. > Or are you > seeking to flesh out a forthcoming thesis / disertation? > No. [1]: http://www.machinekit.io/community/c4/ Best wishes Hedge -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
