Why ROS2, well, basically because it is being developed with RT in mind <https://github.com/ros2/ros2/wiki/Real-Time-Programming>. I'm rather new to ROS, but the current communication scheme does not seem fit <http://wiki.ros.org/ros_control/Ideas> to be closely integrated with machinekit. But thanks a lot for the links (really) I will read on later.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Bas de Bruijn <b...@basdebruijn.com> wrote: > > > On 12 Mar 2018, at 15:48, Maxime Lemonnier <maxime.lemonn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Any interest in ROS, expecially ROS2? > > > ROS, absolutely. Work has been done on this in the past, and there's > ongoing work on ros_control which is not mature enough yet. > Here's a link to a past GH issue. > https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/issues/689 > And a video of my robot running on Machinekit, planned by Moveit. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_oO0OhFvQY&app=desktop > > Is there a reason why you specifically mention ROS2. Do you have a special > need for that? > > Bas > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
