> On 11 Jun 2019, at 01:25, justin White <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Possibly,
>
> Need to do some testing once I get the first rev assembled. This Particular
> board is probably a bit too expensive to make for the open source world to
> want, and the I/O arrangement is somewhat specific to my needs. That many
> Phoenix Contact blocks gets pretty expensive.
I would be interested, keep me updated!
I think machinekit can do with some additional hardware between controllers and
wires.
but imo cheap is a nice to have, function and quality come first. Think about
how something industrial gets wired. Then you need some contact blocks to
easily connect wires. In the total a more expensive part here will give you an
edge somewhere else (manual labor). And indeed when you’re a diy-er labor does
not come into the equation.
> I'll probably drop some OS version into the wild once I get it sorted, with a
> more general I/O layout. This board is setup with 6 differential (or single
> ended) encoder inputs, 6 differential stepgen outputs, 16 5v-30v inputs, 24
> field voltage outputs up to 500ma, 2 opto-mosfet outputs @2A snubbed. Has a
> 5A 5v DC-DC regulator that will accept up to 42VDC, power the DE10-nano
> through GPIO and output the spare 5v up to 3A. My method of stepgen outputs
> and GP inputs needs some testing.
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/AB42AC5E-8278-4975-92FE-F7F10146067F%40basdebruijn.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
