|
Hm. Good point.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:34
PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Story
Hey Cam, You work for IBM, don't bite the hand
that feeds you, Ha. Dad.
At 05:18 PM 02/13/2003,
Cameron MacLean wrote:
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word">
Wondered how long it would take before somebody responded to my poke
in the ribs... ;-)
With all due respect to you yanks down south, I apologize, what
I should have said is that the Bush regime is going to provoke a war in
Iraq. I realize that many of you don't support his agenda.
Unfortunately, many of you do.
Thanks for the well written argument Don, but I don't buy
it. Add a flashy headline, and it could have come directly from
CNN.
I
believe that there are significantly more reasons why we are free from
aggression, than just simply our proximity to the US. Specifically,
(a) geography, in that there aren't very many countries around us, let alone
aggressors, (b), age - we are a young country with little to no history of
either conflict or aggressive, and mostly (c), we are a peaceful people,
with a peaceful government. Our external policies are respectful
as opposed to imposing.
Yeah, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, and yep, he
unfortunately killed many of his own people. Not nearly the number of
human rights violations that China has incurred (ask the Taiwanese, or the
Nepalese), but we don't see Bush trying to oust Zemin. China has
repeatedly stated it will nuke Taiwan if they try to declare
independence (Taiwan is the 6th largest economy in the
world).
And
by the way, the world already told Hussein LAST time that he can't invade
neighboring countries or massacre his own people. The gulf war drove
him back and the UN-imposed sanctions punished Iraq. He has done
nothing at this time, and the UN says so (so far).
Bush indicated at
election time that his policy with respect to Iraq was regime change.
That was before Sept 11. Sept 11 and Al-Qaeda simply distracted
him. Now we see him and his cronies conjuring up any piece of
pseudo-evidence to back their policy of regime change. And Tony Blair
is so close behind Bush, that if Bush stopped suddenly, we would wonder what
happened to Blair's head. Let me ask you this: What gives
anybody the right, let alone some oil-executive/cowboy/president to decide
who should run somebody else's country?
If Hussein has got
weapons of mass destruction, where are they? If he's got links to
Al-Qaeda, who are they? How come the incredible technology of the
entire American military hasn't been able to find a thing (save a couple of
empty howitzer shells).
Bush wants Iraq's oil. Every single person in the US
executive office (Bush, Rice, Cheney, Powell and Rumsfeld) have held
executive-level or board member positions on major oil companies in the
US. Bush is a former oil executive for Arbusto. Dick Cheney was
the CEO for Halliburton Incorporated, the world's largest oil field services
company. Condoleeza Rice sat on Chevron Oil's board of directors, and in
fact she was so popular there that she even has a 130,000-ton oil tanker
named after her. It goes on an on. That's what this war is
about. With the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world sitting
underneath Iraq, it's a no-brainer. I don't mean to imply that Bush is
going to steal Iraqi oil, it's just that without Hussein sticking in their
ribs, it's that much easier to get at.
Let's be realistic
here. Do I think Hussein is a bad guy? Absolutely. Do I
think he's got some nasty weapons, and he's hiding them? Probably,
given his past behaviour. Do I think that we'd all be better off
without him? Most likely. Do I think Bush has the right to take
him out? No way. That's for the people of Iraq to
decide.
The entire world is stressed out right now, and we can
all point our collective finger of responsibility at that dickhead
Dubya. He has summarily pissed off pretty much every other country in
the world right now, save maybe Britain, who seems to think they still are
some sort of superpower. Wait until he decides he wants our water, or
(gad) our softwood lumber. Think he'll be nice and respectful to
us? This guy and his policies, in two years has set American
foreign relations back 20 years. Did we see anything like this during
the Clinton/Gore era?
I tell you what. Give me a
sex scandal in the whitehouse over global war
anyday.
..Cameron
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Don Mac Lean
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:08 PM
- Subject: RE: Fw: Story
- -----Original Message-----
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cameron MacLean
- Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:45 AM
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subject: Re: Fw: Story
- True that the American's have come to the defense of the French (and
usually everybody else in the world, for which we are all thankful), but
that idiot marine wasn't smart enough to realize the French officer's true
point, which is that the Americans are going to provoke a war in
Iraq. Not quite sure why that's a good thing.
-
Well Cameron, my boy.
Consider this.
- We
are fortunate to have grown up and live in a Country where our neighbors
are AMERICAN.
- They are not only neighbors; a lot of them are family members.
Cousins, nephews, nieces and yes, brothers and sisters. There is very
little difference in our way of life and theirs.
- Having spent considerable time living in France, Belgium and Germany,
I know we have a better life here. And why would I think that is
so??? It�s most likely due to the fact we are living under the
umbrella of protection provided by the �Americans�. And if you don�t
believe this. Just look at our military.
- Our Canadian way of life provides many freedoms and benefits. One of
these is the knowledge that we are relatively free from outside aggression
because of our closeness to the Americans. Along with this is the
comfort we enjoy because of the effort of other nations in the world who
wish to live in peace. They have voluntarily signed agreements to form and
support a group of more than half the nations of the world, united in the
same objective of having the world live in peace.
- Not all nations agree with this. They wish to pursue their own
agenda, for whatever reason. Without some form of control in the
world, these rogue nations would pose a threat to all of us by imposing
their dictatorial way of life on us. The losses to us are almost too
much to comprehend.
- When Saddam Hussein demonstrated his evilness to the world by invading
his neighbor Kuwait, and subsequently murdering thousands of his own
people by using chemical and biological agents, he attracted the attention
of the United Nations. This organization demanded that he disarm and
destroy his weapons of mass destruction. He has not done it.
He is defying the world. What choice is left?????
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Lesley and Dave
- To: Chris Heslin ; Faith Heslin ; Jamie Heslin ; Larry/Diane McClure ; David Webster ; MacLean List
- Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:37 PM
- Subject: Fwd: Fw: Story
- Note: forwarded message attached.
-
- Do you Yahoo!?
- Yahoo!
Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
|
