On Mar 9, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Dan Shoop wrote: > You're saying the same thing. There are no resource forks any more. All forks > are now named named. Compressed files have the data fork empty and the > compressed fork stores the data (in compressed form.) Depending on the size > of the named fork it may be stored together with other other named forks - > commonly together with file attribute forks - or it can be stored separately, > this has always been true for named forks under HFS+. File sizes measure data > forks in HFS+ filesystems.
Depends on how the file size is measured or with what. Finder will report such 0 sector, 0 data fork, 0 other fork files with the correct byte count and an "on-disk" value as well, whereas ls will not, nor will du. Both see such files as 0 sectors. Anyway, point is, you can have considerable differences between an original and restored folder using Get Info or du or ls, if you use something other than Time Machine restores or block copy (and again I don't know about Super Duper). Chris Murphy_______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
