On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:35 AM, objectwerks inc wrote: >> >> Read what I just posted on why the list is set up the way it is. It is >> purposefully set up to reply to each poster individually, and not the list. > > Conjecture on your part. >
It is not conjecture on my part. It was specifically said in this list by the omni rep several years ago when this question came up. > List-Post is not set to No, which would be consistent with "purposefully set > up to reply to each poster". Instead it is set to an email address which is > consistent with deferring to the email client what should occur by default. > So Omni is actually taking a neutral position on the issue. Otherwise they > would use No, which is exactly how the RFC reads. List-Post is merely a header to tell you which address to send posts to. It is not a mail header that has specific meaning to email clients to tell them how to respond. It is an informational header only that specifies the posting address. There is a whole raft of List-* headers which are informational. > > > >> There is a reason for it, whether you agree with that reason or not. You >> are not the list owner. > > Nor are you. And what you are saying is speculative at best, and not > supportable logically. It is supported logically -- the list works exactly the way I described and it is supported by historical posts from the Omni list maintainers. Chad > > > Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
