On Mar 10, 2011, at 7:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 10-Mar-2011, at 13:05, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> List serves aren't supposed to use Reply-To: > > But that is not true; that is one persons' interpretation of RFC2369, and it > is not an interpretation shared by anyone of any relevance (you know, like > people who write mail clients, mailing list software, etc. You know, the > people who actually matter on this issue). > > RFC2369 doesn't even mention Reply-To aside for using it as an example in the > background. It's not in RFC 2369, it's in RFC 2822. Reply-To: is author domain. As mentioned, the author could suggest to the list serve they want Reply-To to be set to the list serve email address. But the listserve can't stomp on everyone's Reply-To unless they have some sort of agreement that the user effectively agrees to this policy, and still comply with RFC 2822. Chris Murphy_______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
