Le 2 mars 2012 à 20:07, Chris Murphy a écrit : > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Markus Hitter wrote: > >> >> Am 01.03.2012 um 01:25 schrieb Chris Murphy: >> >>> And while I'm no fan of Microsoft, this seems like it constitutes a major >>> exploit. Like a design level flaw that isn't easy to fix server side or >>> they probably would have done it by now. >> >> Before doing such claims you should perhaps ask how the server is >> configured, first. Every server can be set up in a wide open way, allowing >> everything for everybody. > > It is not a claim. It is called a supposition, and my word selection "seems > like" does establish such. > > And this has been a supposition of mine throughout, if you've kept track of > the whole thread. But Susan has since said she called Apple support, > described the problem, and they appear to be asserting this as a known > problem. > > And also the previous behavior indicates the server was setup expressly in a > way contrary to how you describe, and past versions of OS X honored this > configuration. But now by merely changing clients, this information is being > exposed.
Well, having read the whole thread, I noticed Susan has spoken about a "general Windows server volume" and a "Windows volume", but never specified whether the share is provided by a Mac OS X server or a Windows server. Perhaps would it be nice to have some additional info before going further? Axel _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
