On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Ashley Aitken <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 17/02/2010, at 7:41 AM, George N. White III wrote:
>
>> Separate components simplify problems of thermal management and
>> allow you to replace just the part than broke.   ...  Screens and hard
>> disks are generally the first things to go.  You can replace a hard
>> disk (usually with something larger, faster, and cooler) but with an
>> iMac all you can do is repair the screen, which may take weeks.
>
> I'm with George (I think).  I had a G5 iMac GPU die and it wasn't sensible to 
> pay to replace the whole motherboard.  Now there's a working display and 
> other components (inside the iMac) sitting there, that can't be used.  I'd 
> have similar problems if the display had gone.
>
> I would prefer a midsize system, that would allow be to change the graphics 
> card (so not build onto the motherboard), desktop disk and RAM (of course), 
> and two external displays .  The mini does all of that, except the graphics 
> card and, of course, it has a laptop disk drive.
>
> So I currently buy Mac minis - I would buy more a more expensive midsize 
> systems (as above) if they were available, so I guess Apple is possibly 
> missing out on some money from us.  Now that I think of it, the Cube seems to 
> be exactly what I want.  Unfortunately, that didn't do well.
>
> Having an external power supply brick, like the Cubes did and the Mac minis 
> do, is also not a problem for me (hidden under the desk and behind the TV 
> cabinet).  I think this also enables the units to run a bit quieter than the 
> iMacs which have everything stuck inside the thinnest case possible.
>
> Cheers,
> Ashley.
>
> PS We don't currently play serious GPU games or have other requirements for a 
> high-end GPU (but that's not saying I wouldn't pay for one ...).

High end graphics cards need lots of power and cooling -- often as
much as the rest of the system.   Most have fans and separate power
connectors, so won't fit in a mid-size system (typically 300 wt PS).
At present, I think mid-size systems are for those who need multiple
disks and add-on cards (serial ports, additional USB and firewire,
etc.) with low power demands.

In few years the power requirements for a GPU that would make sense as
an upgrade to 2010 vintage integrated graphics will be lower, but by
then the integrated graphics will have improved, so you are better
buying a mini now and putting the savings (initial and operating cost)
over a mid-size system into a fund for buying a new mini in a couple
years.

> --
> Ashley Aitken
> Perth, Western Australia
> mrhatken at mac dot com
> Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MacOSX-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
>



-- 
George N. White III <[email protected]>
Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk

Reply via email to