Wow, the new nano looks to be an iPhone missing only the 3G?! Okay, looking deeper, it doesn't have a GPS sensor. But is that it? Awesome!
-Jon On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote: > > They look good but I hope they've left in the ability to use earbud controls > (the ones on the earbud cable), especially for the iPod nano (even if they > don't ship with earbuds with the controls. It would be a pain for the nano > having to get a visual on the screen to make any changes and it would be an > alternative for the shuffle (for those people who like to hide the shuffle > away in a pocket). > > I'm not holding my breathe though, it would probably add cents or dollars to > the production cost. > > Cheers, > Ashley. > > PS Also interesting that the screen on the nano is smaller that the 5G, I > guess they wanted to go with a square screen. > > PPS Like the idea of a nano as a watch (how long before someone ships a > suitable band for $20). > > _______________________________________________ > MacOSX-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk > _______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
