Doh! I meant 'iPod Touch' not 'nano', obviously...! -Jon On Sep 2, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Jonathon Kuo wrote:
> Wow, the new nano looks to be an iPhone missing only the 3G?! > Okay, looking deeper, it doesn't have a GPS sensor. > But is that it? > Awesome! > > -Jon > > On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote: > >> >> They look good but I hope they've left in the ability to use earbud controls >> (the ones on the earbud cable), especially for the iPod nano (even if they >> don't ship with earbuds with the controls. It would be a pain for the nano >> having to get a visual on the screen to make any changes and it would be an >> alternative for the shuffle (for those people who like to hide the shuffle >> away in a pocket). >> >> I'm not holding my breathe though, it would probably add cents or dollars to >> the production cost. >> >> Cheers, >> Ashley. >> >> PS Also interesting that the screen on the nano is smaller that the 5G, I >> guess they wanted to go with a square screen. >> >> PPS Like the idea of a nano as a watch (how long before someone ships a >> suitable band for $20). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MacOSX-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk >> > > _______________________________________________ > MacOSX-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk > _______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
