On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote: >> No one has ever been able to give me a convincing answer as to why EOF was >> ditched in favor of CoreData. I can understand EOF, it feels object-oriented >> and ObjC-like. CoreData is a like a plate of spaghetti to my mind, very C++ >> like, syntaxy, and hard to get your head around ... > > How about this for a good reason: EOF was huge and in need of a major overall. > > EOControl was three different classes lumped into one big mess.
Heh, that's how I see CoreData: one big mess. EOF did have one major redeeming quality: I could understand it! :) I've given up on CoreData for now. Maybe someday I'll revisit it... _______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
