On Mar 29, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Nathan Sims wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:23 AM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote: > >>> No one has ever been able to give me a convincing answer as to why EOF was >>> ditched in favor of CoreData. I can understand EOF, it feels >>> object-oriented and ObjC-like. CoreData is a like a plate of spaghetti to >>> my mind, very C++ like, syntaxy, and hard to get your head around ... >> >> How about this for a good reason: EOF was huge and in need of a major >> overall. >> >> EOControl was three different classes lumped into one big mess. > > Heh, that's how I see CoreData: one big mess. EOF did have one major > redeeming quality: I could understand it! :) I've given up on CoreData for > now. Maybe someday I'll revisit it...
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CoreData/Articles/cdFAQ.html%23//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001802-244739 Differences between Core Data and EOF_______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
