Hi,

A month or two ago, I wrote to ask about TimeMachine because the hourly backups 
were taking about 45 minutes, so TM seemed like it was almost always running.  
I ended up swapping out the internal hard drive that I was using for TM backups 
and that seemed to fix the problem.  Well, at least the backups did not take 
nearly so long.  After the drive swap, the backups were taking about 12 
minutes, though I think that number crept up a bit over the last month or two.  
Since 12 minutes seemed much better than 45 minutes, I assumed that all was 
working correctly.

For the past few days, I have been watching the console messages (for 
"backupd") and it appears that the backups are now taking less than a minute!  
I know it must seem like I'm never happy, but now I'm worrying that my files 
are not being properly backed up.  As a test, however, I retrieved a file that 
I know I changed yesterday -- I restored a version a few hours before I changed 
it and another version a few hours after I changed it, and all seemed OK (the 
former did not have the change and the latter did).

I purposely do not backup many of my directories, so very little changes from 
day to day, and maybe this short backup time is to be expected.  That would be 
great.

Here is my question.  If hardly any user files change since the last backup, 
and if all but about 50-gb of my system drive is excluded, how long should the 
entire "backup" process take?  If no user files changed, or very few, then the 
backup of my data should not take long, but I'm sure some system files are 
always changing, and I have no idea how long the search for changed files might 
take.  Which seems more reasonable -- 1 minute or 12 minutes?

Even if the 1 minute time period is correct, I have no idea why (or when) the 
backups went from taking 12 minutes to only taking 1 minute.

Thanks,

Gregg

_______________________________________________
MacOSX-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk

Reply via email to