Indeed, it's there (though it's at the upper right in my version).  I guess I 
should have paid attention to the buttons as well as the menus.

> On Nov 24, 2018, at 1:00 PM, john seward <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Select an email in the list and click on the top left Raw button. It will 
> display the raw source of the email.
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2018, at 1:52 PM, Macs R We <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I do in fact happen to use the mail tag software, but I've never used the 
>> tags function per se — I use it to add notes and tickle reminders.  I've 
>> never tried searching for a tag, but I've launched a search right now to see 
>> how it works.
>> 
>> Well, it's somewhat less than deluxe.  I did a search for messages with 
>> "X-Mailtags" in any raw header.  It found them successfully, but the actual 
>> tag header line was not displayed, even with View / View Text selected (I'd 
>> never used that function before, and it isn't at all comprehensive. It seems 
>> to just turn off HTML, but it doesn't actually show the raw text of the 
>> mail, certainly not the header portion.) 
>> 
>> I tried searching for "X-Mailtags%623" in raw headers (that's my local area 
>> code, so I figured I'd get at least one) and got one message. Again, I 
>> couldn't view the actual tag header.  I used the menu item that saved the 
>> raw text of the found messages to a text file, and the information was 
>> apparent:
>> 
>>          X-Mailtags: {"mailTagsAnnotation":"Experienced Roofing, LLC\nPhone: 
>> (623) 414-0303\n15030 N. 172nd Lane, Surprise, AZ 85388"}
>> 
>> It's more steps to go through than one would like, but it's doable and it's 
>> not too unwieldy.
>> 
>> Also, I'm not running the latest version of the software (there wasn't 
>> anything in the upgrades I felt I needed to pay for) so it's possible the 
>> newer versions do a better job of raw display than the one I'm running.  Or 
>> it's possible the developer could add a real raw display choice to an 
>> upcoming update (I'm copying him).
>> 
>>> On Nov 24, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Chris Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>> 
>>> I was coming round to either MailSteward or Mail Archiver X.  Either would 
>>> seem to fit the bill.
>>> 
>>> How does MailSteward handle Mai Tags, or don’t you use them
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>>> On 24 Nov 2018, at 18:12, Macs R We <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I’ve been using MailSteward Lite for close to a decade and am pretty 
>>>> satisfied with it. I keep telling myself that I ought to upgrade to their 
>>>> top-end version at some point, so it will do real server/client searches 
>>>> on the central repository machine instead of sucking all the data over the 
>>>> network, but never seem to have the time to devote to conversion. I 
>>>> archive my mail on an annual basis cone January, and use it maybe once a 
>>>> quarter to answer questions such as, “When did I get my roof replaced and 
>>>> is it still in warranty?”
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 24, 2018, at 6:43 AM, Chris Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone have any suggestion for archiving mail?  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Whilst IMAP has its advantages I’m starting to run out of server space 
>>>>> and whilst I can transfer stuff to my machine from within Apple Mail I 
>>>>> would like an alternative so I can move the database elsewhere as backup. 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mail Archiver X looks good but does anyone have any other suggestions or 
>>>>> experiences?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MacOSX-talk mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
MacOSX-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk

Reply via email to