On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Terrence Monroe Brannon wrote:
> Ken Williams writes:
> : and my favorite, Mason (http://www.masonhq.com/).
>
> I think Mason is very similar to HTML::Embperl. Both are inline webapp
> toolkits. [...]
well, on some level they're similar, but if you actually work with
them they have very different strengths.
HTML::Embperl has a lot of built in "magic" that works extremely
well for automating your pages if it's what you need.
Mason has amazing features for building up a full site.
Embperl is getting more of those features in 2.x I believe and Mason
gives you more flexibility to "roll your own" within the framework
by being more directly "Perlish".
Try them. Try them.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
