On 7 Jun 2005, at 17:01, I wrote:
Here's a preliminary patch against perl patchlevel 24717 to make 64bitall perl build on Mac OS 10.4.x (Darwin 8.x):

Two additional test failures to add to the list when built with the new compiler in just-released XCode Tools 2.1:

< lib/Benchmark.............................ok
---
> lib/Benchmark.............................# Failed test (../ lib/Benchmark.t at line 80)
> FAILED at test 13

But runs fine every time under harness or harness -v. I notice this test has given "dubious" results in a few smokes, so I guess I'm seeing the same thing. (Test 13 fails if an estimated run time diverges too far from a measured run time.)

< lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy................ok
---
> lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy................FAILED at test 33

But ...

$ ./perl harness ../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t
../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=718, 7 wallclock secs ( 1.30 cusr + 0.68 csys = 1.98 CPU)
$ ./perl harness -v ../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t
...
FAILED tests 5, 7-8
        Failed 3/718 tests, 99.58% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------
../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t              718    3   0.42%  5 7-8
$ ./perl harness -v ../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t
FAILED tests 5, 7-8, 47
        Failed 4/718 tests, 99.44% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------
../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t              718    4   0.56%  5 7-8 47
Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 4/718 subtests failed, 99.44% okay.
$ ./perl harness -v ../lib/Tie/File/t/29_downcopy.t
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=718, 8 wallclock secs ( 1.29 cusr + 0.69 csys = 1.98 CPU)

Weird. Apart from anything else, why does 29a_upcopy work consistently when downcopy fails randomly?
--
Dominic Dunlop

Reply via email to