On Jan 28, 9:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian D Foy) wrote: > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But it seems un- > > parsimonious to me to use namespace for maybe a dozen lines of Perl, > > since right now the "clipboard" part is on the order of > > It's the idea that counts, not the actual implementation. Namespaces > separate ideas into their own parts of the world and hide all of the > details from the user. It doesn't matter what the code is or how long > it is. :)
That seems to argue that I publish Mac::Pasteboard pretty much as is, then follow with Mac::Clipboard. It's lazy, but is it lazy _enough_? Would it expedite discussion if I put out a pre-release of the code? If so, how should it be done? Mail the tarball to people who ask? Post to the newsgroup? Submit to CPAN with a development version number? I can't guarantee the documentation to be limpid prose, but the code works. Tom Wyant
