On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:58:16 -0500, Chris Nandor wrote: >I see this in the Makefile.PL: > > require "./lib/Getopt/Long.pm"; > >Changing it to this works: > > require "lib/Getopt/Long.pm"; Dare we, er, call this a bug? I mean, if Macperl is patched so it correctly understands "path/to/file.pm" with do and require, isn't it reasonable to expect it to understand "./this" and "../that" as well? -- Bart.
- [MacPerl] Getopt::Long installation Ken Williams
- Re: [MacPerl] Getopt::Long installation Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] Getopt::Long installation Bart Lateur
- Re: [MacPerl] Getopt::Long installation Chris Nandor