At 23:34 +0100 02.05.2001, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:58:16 -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
>
>>I see this in the Makefile.PL:
>>
>> require "./lib/Getopt/Long.pm";
>>
>>Changing it to this works:
>>
>> require "lib/Getopt/Long.pm";
>
>Dare we, er, call this a bug? I mean, if Macperl is patched so it
>correctly understands "path/to/file.pm" with do and require, isn't it
>reasonable to expect it to understand "./this" and "../that" as well?
I don't know. It is reasonable to talk about whether or not it is
reasonable to expect it ... :-) Matthias?
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
