At 12:38 +0000 02.16.2001, Alan Fry wrote:
>I have sent two test files (a text file that failed to make it
>through to the list) to Ask Bjorn Hansen and received these replies:
>
>1) in relation to a 'BinHex' attachement:
>At 2:53 am -0800 16/02/01, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>>yes, application/mac-binhex40 is filtered out. If you can ask on the
>>list and get consensus for not doing that I'll take it out.
>
>2) in relation to an 'AppleDouble' (MIME'd) attachment.
>At 2:53 am -0800 16/02/01, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>>in the second file you sent, the data part of the attachment would
>>have made it through. And be easily readable for all mail readers
>>too. (it is just text after all).
>
>So the question to us all is: do we want the 'BinHex' filter removed?

I think it should be allowed on the porters list.  I don't know, it might
be good to not allow it to the regular MacPerl list.  I don't care either
way about this on the main list, though.  If people want it, then that's
fine by me.


At 07:45 -0500 02.16.2001, Paul Schinder wrote:
>At 12:38 +0000 02.16.2001, Alan Fry wrote:
>>My own feeling is I _would_ like to see it removed. Unencoded
>>scripts, documents with long lines and/or high-ascii characters
>>always get mangled along the way. For Mac users 'BinHex' is kind of
>>the conditioned reflex and for Eudora fans the usual (?) default
>>setting.
>
>It shouldn't be, for just the reasons Ask mentioned.  Just have
>Eudora use Appledouble.  If that's not the default these days, it
>should be.  It makes no difference if you're sending to other Mac
>users, and makes a great difference if you're not.  Don't assume that
>anyone here is necessarily reading mail under Mac OS.

True; but that said, wouldn't using AppleDouble strip out the resource
data, if I am reading Ask correctly?  It seems like AppleDouble is fine for
patches etc., but BinHex better for a small binary attachment.  Unless we
just say to use AppleDouble/MIME for the list, and request that Ask not
strip the binary/resource portion for our lists.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://osdn.com/

Reply via email to