in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Randy Boring at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/01/2003 17:38:

>>> You asked about MacPerl, so we're assuming you're not doing this
>>> under OS X.  
>> 
>> Yes, your assumption is correct and the reason why I mentioned MacPerl (get
>> non ported modules out of question) - This Mac it's an old PPC 8500/120
>> under Mac OS 8.6. If needed, it can boot under Mac OS 9.1, but no way under
>> Mac OS X.
> 
> Actually, Mac OS X works fine on a 7500/7300/7600/8500/8600/9500/9600 and
> clones with XPostFacto freeware.  I run 10.1.5 on my 7500/225 (604e).
> 10.2 is said to need a G3 or G4 accellerator to work.
> 
> http://eshop.macsales.com/OSXCenter/XPostFacto/
> 
> So is X (or specifically Perl on X) would be a better solution for you,
> it IS possible.
> 
> -Randy

I heard about the XPostFacto freeware - the main point I have against this
approach is that Mac OS X would stress too much this machine, as it is RAM-
and hard disk space-limited. I am not considering any hardware upgrade for
this Mac (because it is quite adequate for the assigned jobs, upgrades are
very costly here, and I prefer to save any possible dollar for a new
machine).

Anyway, thanks for your interest.

Ciao,
Ricardo

Reply via email to