On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote: [...] > Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone agrees > that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is messy and > undesirable. Please, stop bringing this up as it really is beating a > dead horse at this point. Also, to assume that this is the only option > for including this functionality is ridiculous. > > So, instead of trashing one bad idea (over and over), how about > discussing ways that might get this wanted functionality in with > minimal pain. A couple ideas have already been thrown out there. How > about sticking to discussing those (or other ones)?
Yes, and as this has been said somewhere, this should be done upstream (perhaps at the autoconf level, with a new option --enable-universal). Indeed, I don't see why only MacPorts users could be interested in universal binaries. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
