On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote:
[...]
Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone
agrees
that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is messy and
undesirable. Please, stop bringing this up as it really is beating a
dead horse at this point. Also, to assume that this is the only
option
for including this functionality is ridiculous.
So, instead of trashing one bad idea (over and over), how about
discussing ways that might get this wanted functionality in with
minimal pain. A couple ideas have already been thrown out there.
How
about sticking to discussing those (or other ones)?
Yes, and as this has been said somewhere, this should be done upstream
(perhaps at the autoconf level, with a new option --enable-universal).
Indeed, I don't see why only MacPorts users could be interested in
universal binaries.
I guess nobody feels responsible for taking care of universal binaries:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00320.html
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/
blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-
Lyon)
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
