On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
IIRC this already came up once but went unresolved. Four digit
version numbers are not that common, so this is probably an
overlook for that case either in the "get_outdated_ports" tcl proc
in port(1) (base/src/port/port.tcl) or in the "rpm_vercomp" C
function of the Pextlib library (base/src/pextlib1.0/vercomp.c),
used said proc. I'd appreciate it if one of you could search trac
for a similar report and put it in the "Needs developer review"
milestone if not already there, or file it from scratch if one does
not already exist.
Thanks for the report and help! Regards,...
and for the immediate workaround, the port maintainer can bump the epoch.
-- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
