On Apr 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, James Berry wrote:
o Now, can anybody give me any valid data on a case where there's
a failure to
o detect an outdated version? If so, what does port info show for
version and
o epoch, and what's the installed version? In other words, what is
the data that
o the outdated routines are comparing?
I don't know if my version of port is too outdated to be useful,
but I
end up seeing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:sal>port info tor
tor 0.1.1.26, security/tor (Variants: universal)
http://tor.eff.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:sal>port installed tor
The following ports are currently installed:
tor @0.1.1.26_0 (active)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:sal>port -d outdated tor
DEBUG: Found port in
file:///Users/sal/Projects/MacPorts/macports-trunk/dports/security/
tor
No installed ports are outdated.
-- Sal
smile.
So that looks perfectly normal. Installed is the same version that
the port index has listed, so it doesn't show up as outdated.
James
Sal, did you sync your tree before performing this test....? I don't
have tor installed, but I see:
$[juan @MacBookPro: base](489/0,0) -> port search tor
---snip---
tor security/tor 0.1.2.13
anonymizing overlay network for TCP
---snip---
So I wouldn't be too sure about calling those results conclusive,
I'm afraid.
-jmpp
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
