Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I was just wondering why it should make so many existing ports
invalid,
but as long as someone is up to renaming all the files and
Portfiles...
It doesn't make them invalid. They still work fine. "port lint" exists
to tell you about things that are wrong with your portfiles (errors)
and things which could be improved about your portfiles (warnings).
The patchname check is a warning, not an error.
I was kinda hoping that the ports should pass without errors OR
warnings.
But maybe it should whine about missing modelines or tab characters too,
I just thought we had agreed that both forms of patches were acceptable.
If it indeed is something that "SHOULD" be used, then by all means lint.
--anders
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
