Ok, I'll take a look at that ticket once I finish working through the
xorg-libs stragglers...
On Feb 28, 2009, at 13:37, Frank Schima wrote:
On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Feb 28, 2009, at 13:16, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:17:40PM -0800, [email protected]
said:
Revision: 47503
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47503
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-02-28 12:17:39 -0800 (Sat, 28 Feb 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
gdal: Updated giflib dependence to be ok with libungif
Why? libungif has been superceded by giflib upstream [1], so
shouldn't we
be preferring giflib in all cases now?
Yeah, we're PREFERRING giflib. As long as libungif remains in the
tree, we need to avoid the conflict.
Hence: path:include/gif_lib.h:giflib
If someone wants to nuke port:libungif (make it a stub that just
pulls in giflib), I'll support that.
There's a ticket [1] on this subject. There's still a few ports left
that depend on libungif that need to be switched. I couldn't get at
least one of them to compile when I switched the dependency though.
[1] <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17193>
Cheers!
Frank
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
