I don't seeing using HTML 5 as an upgrade so much as a side step. It doesn't break things -- even as far back as IE6, which most companies use.

Also, since yet another ticket has shown up due to having to do fun fancy tagging due to the XML side of XHTML, I figured it would be another reason to bring back the discussion of getting of XHTML.

On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Walt Pawley wrote:

Ah, my category.

It's been my experience that every such "upgrade" breaks the
functionality of browsers that are not "up to date." New
browsers, OTOH, seldom have trouble rendering decent
presentations of the standards of their predecessors'. Is the
point of fixing what isn't broken just being "politically
correct?"

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to