Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I would actually prefer a little less often, like a "stable" branch.
But I know MacPorts doesn't have the resources nor the interest to
do that, so I just upgrade less often instead. Like this old Tigger,
which isn't really supported anymore now that Snow Leopard is out ?
According to the Guide and our tradition, we support the current OS
(i.e. Snow Leopard) and the one before that (i.e. Leopard). But we
still provide a disk image of MacPorts for Tiger, and I would like
to continue to allow ports to be used on it as much as possible. I
have upgraded my primary system from Tiger to Snow Leopard and I
expect the number of maintainers with access to Tiger is dwindling,
so you should expect more ports to break on Tiger as ports get
updated and not tested on Tiger anymore. But please do file tickets
for problems encountered on Tiger. I can still boot to Tiger if
needed to test and fix things.
I have upgraded to Leopard (without the Snow), can boot into Tiger.
But normally, I still build Universal Binaries with the 10.4 SDK...
When not in MacPorts that is, since it doesn't do cross-compiles and
doesn't really build binary packages either. Just "regular Mac OS X".
I expect Tiger to be every bit as much deprecated now as Panther was
in MacPorts 1.7 (and Jaguar in MacPorts 1.4, or whenever it died...)
So wouldn't the +darwin_8 variants be deleted in MacPorts 1.9 anyway ?
But sure, as it'll probably be running around here for a bit still...
--anders
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev