On 2009-10-8 19:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 03:41, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2009-10-8 19:34, Anders F Björklund wrote: >> >>> Still seems like a design flaw to have build_arch in the "configure" >>> namespace, but that's another story. At least it's not "universal". >> >> That's another point; when a port is built universal, the archive needs >> to be tagged with the list of universal_archs instead of the build_arch. > > I would tag it with both, just to be on the safe side. A poorly-written > configure script could easily build a different universal binary on a > PowerPC Mac than it would on an Intel Mac. It doesn't hurt to always > record the arch of the machine that did the build, and might at some > point prove useful.
But the architecture of the machine that did the build has nothing to do with build_arch... - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
