Joshua Root wrote:
I would tag it with both, just to be on the safe side. A poorly-
written
configure script could easily build a different universal binary on a
PowerPC Mac than it would on an Intel Mac. It doesn't hurt to always
record the arch of the machine that did the build, and might at some
point prove useful.
But the architecture of the machine that did the build has nothing
to do
with build_arch...
It should have, otherwise it would be cross-compiling to another arch ?
(which is interesting in itself, but not supported by MacPorts afaik)
Not sure if it matters if the "extra" fat architecture is ppc or x86_64,
when talking about +universal archives built on the regular i386 arch ?
--anders
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
