Le 19 oct. 2009 à 21:35, Joshua Root a écrit :
If it isn't already apparent, a portgroup is the wrong place to do
what
muniversal attempts. All the oddities in its implementation, and all
the
ways the rules for what you can and can't do in the portfile change,
stem from this.
What would you propose instead? Put that mechanism directly in base?
V.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
