On 2009-10-20 07:17, vincent habchi wrote: > Le 19 oct. 2009 à 21:35, Joshua Root a écrit : > >> If it isn't already apparent, a portgroup is the wrong place to do what >> muniversal attempts. All the oddities in its implementation, and all the >> ways the rules for what you can and can't do in the portfile change, >> stem from this. > > What would you propose instead? Put that mechanism directly in base?
That or add a new mechanism that allows the right kind of extensibility. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
