Hi,
I don't care about naming.
As long as it's updated timely (that's when I notice that gnome-python
2.28 is out since Mars 30 and I must update the portfile :-) ).
To my mind, there shouldn't even be 2 ports but 2 variants.
I can't wait for registry 2.0.
Cheers,
Eric
Le 15/04/10 00:30, Rainer Müller a écrit :
Hello David, Landon, and Eric (two times ;-))
at the moment you maintain the ports gnome-python-desktop,
gnome-python-extras, gnome-python26-extras and py*-gnome. They are quite
similar and refer to the same upstream source. It's quite unfortunate
that they use different naming. This should be changed to be more
consistent.
In my opinion these ports should follow the py*-gnome* naming as this
allows to have multiple ports for different versions of python.
I propose that these should be changed to:
* py*-gnome (already exists)
* py*-gnome-desktop (renamed gnome-python-desktop)
* py*-gnome-extras (renamed gnome-python*-extras)
What do you think about this?
Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
